Evidence Hub

Placental histopathology in early-onset fetal growth restriction with use of sildenafil, a secondary analysis of the Dutch STRIDER study

Feenstra ME, Schoots MH, Bezemer R, van der Meeren LE, Nikkels PG, Goor HV, Hillebrands JL, Prins JR et al.

Placenta, 2025

85 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Placental pathology lesions are common in early-onset fetal growth restriction (eoFGR). Therapeutic interventions to improve eoFGR outcomes are needed. In the international STRIDER trials (Sildenafil Therapy In Dismal prognosis Early-onset intrauterine growth Restriction) sildenafil didn't improve perinatal outcomes of eoFGR. We aimed to study the underlying placental pathology in the Dutch STRIDER trial and the effects of sildenafil on placental histopathology by describing the associations with sildenafil treatment, placental-dysfunction serum biomarkers and markers of oxidative stress.

METHODS

The Dutch STRIDER trial was a randomized controlled trial of sildenafil versus placebo in 216 singleton pregnancies complicated by eoFGR, included between 20+0- and 29+6-weeks' gestation. In 158 cases, placental histology was available. Lesions were classified independently by three perinatal pathologists blinded for clinical data, according to the international criteria of the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Blood samples taken at inclusion were analyzed for free thiols (FT), placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1, n = 85).

RESULTS

The 'big four' placental lesions (maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion, and chronic or acute inflammatory lesions) were equally distributed in both groups. However, massive perivillous fibrin deposition (MPFD) and chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHIV) were less common in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 85 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free