Evidence Hub

Renal Effects of Combination Phosphodiesterase V Inhibition and Low-Dose B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Acute Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Hubers SA, Benike SL, Johnson BK, McKie PM, Scott C, Chen HH

Circulation. Heart failure, 2024

67 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiorenal dysfunction with impaired cyclic GMP (cGMP) response is common in patients presenting with acute heart failure (HF). Type V phosphodiesterase (PDEV) is known to be upregulated in HF and may explain the dysfunction of renal response. The aim of this study was to determine whether B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) alone or in combination with PDEV inhibition improves renal function and increases urinary sodium and cGMP excretion in acute HF.

METHODS: This open-label study included 67 patients hospitalized with acute HF and renal dysfunction. Patients were randomized to standard care, low-dose intravenous BNP (0.005 µg/kg per minute), or combination BNP/PDEV inhibition with sildenafil (25 mg q12 hours) for 48 hours. The coprimary end points were the percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate and blood urea nitrogen from baseline to 48 hours.

RESULTS: Treatment with BNP and BNP/PDEV inhibitor significantly increased plasma cGMP at 24 hours (+25.6% [+9.8%, +84.7%] and +60.8% [+32.3%, +103.8%] for BNP and BNP/PDEV versus -13.5% [-29.1%, +14.2%] with standard care; P=0.001). However, there was no significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate 0 (-10.8%, +12.7%) for standard care versus 0 (-15.3%, +11.8%) for the BNP group versus -8.8% (-14.3%, +8.3%) for the BNP/PDEV group (P=0.60) or blood urea nitrogen -1.4% (-10.7%, +12.0%) for standard care versus -5.9% (-14.6%, +9.4%) for the BNP group versus +6.9% (-5.3%, +18.8%) for the BNP/PDEV…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free