Evidence Hub

hUC-MSCs loaded collagen scaffold for refractory thin endometrium caused by Asherman syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Hou Z, Yang T, Xu D, Fu J, Tang H, Zhao J, Zhang Q, Chen J et al.

Stem cells translational medicine, 2025

25 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

In this single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, we investigated whether human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells loaded collagen scaffolds (hUC-MSC/CS) could improve the cumulative live-birth rate (cLBR) in infertile women with refractory thin endometrium (RTE). We randomly assigned 25 subfertile women with RTE, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and plowing plus either hUC-MSC/CS or saline/CS (control) for intrauterine implantation. Uterine fluid was collected on the embryo transfer day for RNA-sequencing to explore the potential mechanisms by which hUC-MSCs exert their effects. The primary outcome was the cLBR. Live births occurred in 3 out of 11 women in the hUC-MSC/CS group and in 1 out of 13 women in the control group (27.3% vs 7.7%; relative risk [RR], 3.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 29.42; P = .30). The cumulative frequencies of clinical pregnancy were 5/11 and 1/13 in the hUC-MSC/CS group and control group, respectively (45.5% vs. 7.7%; RR, 5.91; 95% CI, 0.81-43.28; P = .06). Two of 11 participants developed urticaria in the hUC-MSC/CS group. Enrichment analysis showed that T-cell activation had the largest proportion in the biological process category. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis showed that most genes were related to cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. In conclusion, there was a non-significant trend toward a higher cLBR with hUC-MSC/CS compared to controls,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free