Evidence Hub

Long-term Efficacy of Pulmonary Artery Desnervation Treatment in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Subgroup Analysis of 3-year Results From the PADN-5 Study

Hang Zhang, Wan-de Yu, Mengyu Zhang, Wei Li, Jing Kan, Du-Jiang Xie, Juan Zhang, Shaoliang Chen

Cardiology Discovery, 2024

98 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: The Pulmonary Arterial Denervation in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With the Left Heart Failure (PADN-5) study proved that pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) is associated with significant improvements in hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with combined pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH). This study aimed to assess the 3-year clinical results of PADN in patients who had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) developing into CpcPH (HFpEF-CpcPH). Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the PADN-5 trial, 38 patients with HFpEF were included in screening out of 98 patients with CpcPH who were randomly assigned to treatment with sildenafil and sham PADN (sham PADN (plus sildenafil) group, abbreviated as sham group) or PADN (PADN group). HFpEF in the PADN-5 trial was defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, and CpcPH was defined as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg, a pulmonary arterial wedge pressure >15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance >3.0 WU. The changes in the 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) and the plasma concentration of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at 6-month and 3-year follow-up, as well as the clinical endpoint of the occurrence of clinical worsening, defined as cardiopulmonary-related death, rehospitalization, or heart or lung transplantation at 3-year follow-up were examined. Results: Thirty-eight patients with HFpEF-CpcPH were assigned to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free