Evidence Hub

Neuroprotective Effects of Epicatechin against Oxidative Stress-Induced Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Young Cheol Yoon, Y. Min, H. Putra, I. Cho, C. Jung, Sun Jo Kim, I. Hwang, Hwan-Hee Jang et al.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2025

14 citations

Abstract

Oxidative stress is crucial in the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment and neurodegenerative diseases. Epicatechin, a natural flavanol abundant in cocoa, is a promising neuroprotective agent because of its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of epicatechin in mitigating oxidative stress-induced cognitive impairment in animal models. A systematic review of in vivo rodent studies was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, including studies reporting cognitive- and brain-based biochemical outcomes following epicatechin administration. The results indicated that epicatechin significantly improved the cognitive performance of rodents in the Morris water maze test, including improved spatial learning (reduced escape latency), memory retention (increased time spent in the target quadrant), and memory precision (increased island crossings). At the molecular level, epicatechin treatment increased the expression or activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 and reduced the levels of nitric oxide, malondialdehyde, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1 beta. These findings support the role of epicatechin in enhancing antioxidant defense and modulating neuroinflammation. Collectively, the results highlight that epicatechin has the therapeutic potential for preventing or mitigating oxidative stress-related…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free