Evidence Hub

Cancer Risk in 47,241 Individuals with Celiac Disease - A Nationwide Cohort Study

B. Lebwohl, P. Green, L. Emilsson, K. Mårild, J. Söderling, B. Roelstraete, J. Ludvigsson

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2021

47,241 participants · 62 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Celiac disease (CD) is associated with increased mortality, in part due to cancer. Most studies investigating this cancer risk involved patients diagnosed before widespread increases in CD diagnosis rates and access to gluten-free food. We performed a population-based study of the risk of cancer in CD.

METHODS

We identified all patients in Sweden with CD as defined as duodenal villus atrophy, using the ESPRESSO cohort. Each patient was matched to ≤5 controls by age, sex, and county. We used stratified Cox proportional-hazards model, following patients from diagnosis until first cancer, or by December 31, 2016.

RESULTS

Among 47,241 patients with CD, 30,080 (64%) were diagnosed since 2000. After a median follow-up of 11.5 years, the incidence of cancer was 6.5 and 5.7 per 1000 person-years in CD patients and controls, respectively. The overall risk of cancer was increased (hazard ratio[HR] 1.11; 95%CI 1.07-1.15), but was only significantly elevated in the first year after CD diagnosis (HR 2.47; 95%CI 2.22-2.74), and not subsequently (HR 1.01; 95%CI 0.97-1.05), though the risks of hematologic, lymphoproliferative, hepatobiliary, and pancreas cancers persisted. The overall risk was highest in those diagnosed with CD after age 60 years (HR 1.22; 95%CI 1.16-1.29) and was not increased in those diagnosed before age 40. The cancer risk was similar among those diagnosed with CD before or after the year 2000.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased risk of cancer in CD, even in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 47,241 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free