Evidence Hub

爪真菌症の治療における新規経口トリアゾール系抗真菌薬であるfosravuconazole L-lysine ethanolate付加物の有効性と安全性 多施設共同二重盲検無作為化第III相試験(Efficacy and safety of fosravuconazole L-lysine ethanolate, a novel oral triazole antifungal agent, for the treatment of onychomycosis: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase III study)

Watanabe S, Tsubouchi I, Okubo A

The Journal of dermatology, 2018

153 participants · 79 citations

Abstract

Fosravuconazole L-lysine ethanolate (F-RVCZ) is a prodrug of ravuconazole, a novel triazole antifungal agent, exerting broad and potent antifungal activity. The efficacy and safety of F-RVCZ, compared with a placebo, were investigated in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of Japanese onychomycosis patients with 25% or more clinical involvement of the target toenail. Subjects (n = 153) were randomly assigned to receive F-RVCZ (100 mg RVCZ, n = 101) or placebo (n = 52) p.o. once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end-point was the rate of complete cure (clinical cure [0% clinical involvement of the target toenail] plus mycological cure [negative potassium hydroxide examination]) at week 48 (36-week post-treatment visit). Secondary end-points were changes over time in the efficacy and mycological effect of F-RVCZ. Safety was also evaluated. The complete cure rate at week 48 was significantly higher with F-RVCZ (59.4%, 60/101) than the placebo (5.8%, 3/52) in the full analysis set (P < 0.001). The mycological cure rate at week 48 was also significantly higher with F-RVCZ (82.0%, 73/89) than the placebo (20.0%, 10/50, P < 0.001). Regarding safety, adverse events were observed in 83.2% (84/101) and 80.8% (42/52), and adverse drug reactions (ADR) in 23.8% (24/101) and 3.8% (2/52) of F-RVCZ and placebo subjects, respectively. ADR were mild to moderate in severity, with none being serious. F-RVCZ (equivalent to 100 mg ravuconazole) administrated once daily for 12 weeks was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 153 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free