Evidence Hub

Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) Identifies a Significant Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Susceptibility Locus Near BICRA

Christopher J. Walker, C. Oakes, Luke K. Genutis, B. Giacopelli, S. Liyanarachchi, D. Nicolet, Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld, M. Scholz et al.

Blood, 2018

1,183 participants

Abstract

Introduction: AML is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults, but hereditary predisposition to AML has been insufficiently studied. To date, investigations of AML heritability have focused on families with a clear history of AML and identified rare highly penetrant germline mutations that segregate with disease. However, the role of common polymorphisms in susceptibility to AML is not clear. We therefore conducted the first large-scale GWAS to identify risk alleles for adult de novo AML.

Methods: Whole-genome genotyping was performed on two independent American case-control sets, using Illumina Infinium Omni-1 Quad-bead arrays. GWAS quality control measures consisted of excluding samples with <94% genotyping yield or <90% European ancestry, and variants with <94% yield, differences among batches or significant (P<10-6) deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Phasing and imputation yielded a total of 16,058,266 autosomal variants. Association tests were performed using logistic regression including age, sex, and ten principal components as co-variates. Selected variants were genotyped in a German validation case-control set using an Agena MassARRAY System. Results were combined using METAL with fixed effects. P<5x10-8 was considered the threshold for genome-wide significance.

Results: Two separate GWASs were performed in a total of 1,183 American AML patients from the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology and 2,369 population- and age-matched controls from…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,183 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free