Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review of the Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications of GHK-Cu (Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine-Copper Complex) in Topical Microneedle Delivery: A Case for Expanded Clinical Trials

Niayesh Najafi, Hussein Maatouk, Karapet Gary Vardanyan, K. B. Vartanian, Devendra K. Agrawal

Archives of Internal Medicine Research, 2026

Abstract

GHK-Cu, the copper-bound form of the human tripeptide glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine has accumulated more than four decades of pre-clinical evidence for tissue regeneration, anti-inflammatory action, antioxidant capacity, and broad gene-expression remodeling. Yet despite this volume, the clinical literature in humans remains thin and fragmented: most randomized trials are small, conducted on facial cosmetic creams, and rarely paired with delivery technologies capable of reliably crossing the stratum corneum. The microneedle-mediated delivery route which has been shown in vitro and in porcine ex vivo models to dramatically enhance GHK-Cu skin uptake has yet to be evaluated in a single registered, adequately powered human randomized controlled trial published in the peer-reviewed literature. This systematic review synthesizes the body of GHK-Cu literature published between 2005 and 2026, mapped against the PRISMA framework. Searches across PubMed, Elsevier ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Registry yielded 1,247 records; after deduplication and screening, 64 records were retained for qualitative synthesis. Studies were stratified by study model (in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo rodent, in vivo non-rodent, and human) so that comparator therapies could be matched on equivalent footing. A critical discussion is provided on the physiology and underlying mechanistic foundation of GHK-Cu activity, including its role as an endogenous matricryptin released from collagen Iα2 and SPARC,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free