Evidence Hub

Evaluation of dietary protein and amino acid requirements: a systematic review

Kendal M Burstad, Toyin Lamina, Amy Erickson, Esmaeel Gholizadeh, Hildah Namigga, Amy M. Claussen, Joanne L Slavin, Levi Teigen et al.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2025

19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Protein intakes are set by the dietary reference intakes, which were published in 2005 and have not been updated since.

OBJECTIVES

This review assesses the evidence on requirements for average daily dietary protein and individual indispensable amino acid intake for healthy individuals by life stage and sex.

METHODS

Literature was searched from January 2000 through May 2024 in Medline, EMBASE, AGRICOLA, and Scopus. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text publications using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. We extracted data, assessed risk of bias (RoB), qualitatively synthesized results from low to moderate RoB studies, and evaluated the strength of evidence supporting conclusions.

RESULTS

We identified 11,408 studies, of which 68 articles reporting on 66 unique studies were eligible for the review and 45 were assessed as low or moderate RoB. For infants, 6 studies examined requirements for isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine. For children/adolescents, 7 studies examined requirements for protein, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, and total branched-chain amino acids. For pregnant people, 4 studies examined requirements for protein, lysine, and phenylalanine. For adults 19-50 y, 16 studies examined requirements for protein, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, and valine and for adults 51->70 y, and 6 studies examined requirements for protein, leucine,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free