Evidence Hub

Coexistence of glutamic acid decarboxylase- and somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in neurons of the feline nucleus reticularis thalami

W. H. Oertel, AM Graybiel, E. Mugnaini, R. Elde, D. Schmechel, I. Kopin

Journal of Neuroscience, 1983

207 citations

Abstract

The presence of somatostatin-like (SOM) immunoreactivity within GABAergic neurons of the nucleus reticularis thalami (NRT) was demonstrated by immunocytochemical methods in the cat using a two-color, double immunoperoxidase method with antisera raised in different species. GABAergic neurons were identified by means of a sheep antiserum to glutamic acid decarboxylase, the biosynthetic enzyme for y-aminobutyric acid (GABA). SOM immunoreactivity was visualized with a rabbit antiserum to synthetic somatostatin. Vibratome sections of perfusion-fixed tissue were processed according to the pre-embedding unlabeled peroxidase antiperoxidase (PAP) method for light and electron microscopy. Single sections through the NRT were first processed for glutamic acid decarboxylase-like (GAD) or SOM immunoreactivity. With either antiserum, most neurons of the NRT were immunoreactive. The intracellular sites recognized by the two antisera had only partially overlapping distributions. SOM immunoreactivity appeared largely restricted to perinuclear structures which were identified by electron microscopy as the Golgi apparatus and multivesicular bodies. GAD immunoreactivity also appeared in the Golgi apparatus but was broadly dispersed throughout the cytoplasm of the cell body and dendrites. Intensely GAD-immunoreactive dots in the neuropil of the NRT were shown by electron microscopy to be immunoreactive boutons. Coexistence of the SOM and GAD antigens was demonstrated in sections sequentially…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free