Evidence Hub

[177Lu]Lu-dota-tate versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic progressive neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas (OCLURANDOM): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial

E. Baudin, A. Durand, A. Béron, Denis Smith, D. Deandreis, D. Taieb, C. Ansquer, L. Dierickx et al.

The Lancet Oncology, 2026

43 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, no randomised trial with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has been done in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity and safety of [177Lu]Lu-dota-tate in this setting.

METHODS

OCLURANDOM is a randomised, open-label, non-comparative, phase 2 trial conducted in ten academic centres in France. Patients aged 18 years and older with pretreated, progressive, somatostatin receptor-positive, metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were randomly assigned (1:1) using web-based software to receive intravenous [177Lu]Lu-dota-tate (7·4 GBq every 8 weeks up to four cycles) with concomitant amino acid infusion or oral sunitinib (37·5 mg once daily). Amino acid infusion was for at least 4 h starting 30 min before [177Lu]Lu-dota-tate infusion and included 16·8 g of arginine and 22 g of lysine in 2 L until May, 2018, and, from that date, a solution of 25 g of arginine and 25 g of lysine in 2 L. Randomisation was stratified according to Ki-67, liver involvement, and previous therapies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 months assessed by real-time central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. Cross-over was allowed. Adverse events in the as-treated population were assessed continuously during the active phase of treatment and then…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 43 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free