Evidence Hub

Blood mRNA biomarkers distinguish variable systemic and sputum inflammation at treatment initiation of inhaled antibiotics in cystic fibrosis: A prospective non-randomized trial

S. Caceres, L. Sanders, N. Rysavy, Katie Poch, Caroline Jones, K. Pickard, T. Fingerlin, Roland A. Marcus et al.

PLoS ONE, 2022

3 citations

Abstract

Inhaled antibiotics control chronic airway infection and maintain respiratory health in cystic fibrosis (CF). Given variation in patient responses to inhaled antibiotics, the ability to identify distinct responder phenotypes would facilitate the delivery of personalized care. Previously, a 10-gene panel was identified, measured directly from blood leukocytes, which predicted host response to intravenous antibiotic treatment during pulmonary exacerbations. In the current study, we tested whether the same panel predicted clinical response in subjects receiving a month of inhaled antibiotic therapy with aztreonam lysine (AZLI; Cayston®). A small cohort of CF subjects infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa were enrolled at baseline health, prior to initiating one month’s treatment with AZLI using the Altera® nebulizer system. Eighteen CF subjects underwent blood leukocyte gene panel measurements, sputum quantitative microbiology, spirometry, and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement prior to onset and at completion of 4 weeks of AZLI therapy. Mean absolute improvement in percent predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (ppFEV1) was 3%. Significant reductions in sputum bacterial colony counts were detected with treatment. CRP increased following treatment. While single genes within the panel did not change significantly following treatment, the analysis of multigene panel data demonstrated that HCA112 gene predicted ppFEV1 improvement. Hierarchical clustering based on gene…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free