Evidence Hub

A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer

M. J. Whitley, Diana M. Cardona, Alexander L. Lazarides, I. Spasojević, J. Ferrer, J. Cahill, Chang-Lung Lee, M. Snuderl et al.

Science Translational Medicine, 2016

15 participants · 262 citations

Abstract

A first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial of the PEGylated protease-activated fluorescent probe, LUM015, enables tumor imaging at a safe and tolerable dose in humans. Protease probe tested in humans Cancer cells secrete more of the protease cathepsin than healthy cells, partly as a way to enzymatically remodel their surroundings for tumor growth and metastasis. Whitley et al. developed an imaging probe that could be activated in the presence of these cathepsins, thus allowing surgeons to distinguish tumor margins intraoperatively. Their probe, called LUM015, was able to signal the presence of cancer in vivo in a mouse sarcoma model, and in a so-called “co-clinical trial” in 15 patients, it was safe and cleaved as expected in different types of tumor tissues. With favorable biodistribution and pharmacokinetics also demonstrated, protease-activated probes are now poised for further adaptation to tumor resections, signaling the presence of residual cancer. Local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure for patients with solid tumors. Intraoperative detection of microscopic residual cancer in the tumor bed could be used to decrease the risk of a positive surgical margin, reduce rates of reexcision, and tailor adjuvant therapy. We used a protease-activated fluorescent imaging probe, LUM015, to detect cancer in vivo in a mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and ex vivo in a first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial. In mice, intravenous injection of LUM015 labeled tumor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free