Evidence Hub

Evaluating the Therapeutic Efficacy of L-Lysine Aescinat Supplementation on Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Fractures and Traumatic Spine Injuries: A Prospective Cohort Study from Tbilisi, Georgia

Koka Gogichashvili, Zviad Malazonia, Tornike Kldiashvili, Ciara Francesca Maxwell

Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2024

32 participants

Abstract

This prospective study aimed to comprehensively investigate the impact of L-Lysine aescinat supplementation on the neurological outcomes of patients recovering from spinal fractures and traumatic spine injuries. A total of 32 patients were recruited and categorised into two groups: Group A (n=16), receiving L-Lysine aescinat supplementation, and Group B (N=16), serving as the control group without L-Lysine aescinat administration. The primary objective was to assess changes in the Karnofsky performance scale, a functional and well-being neurological assessment tool especially for those undergoing operations or with chronic illness, over a follow up period of one month in order to determine if L-Lysine aescinat had an immediate effect on recovery in the post-operative period. Urinary dysfunction was noted, alongside the location of the fracture, type of surgery and if there were any significant comorbidities.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 32 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free