Evidence Hub

Lysine degradation-related metabolic remodeling in sarcopenia: Mendelian randomization prioritization and multi-omics-based characterization

S. Hong, Ji-Su Park, Jeong-Hyun Kang

Clinical Nutrition, 2026

40 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Previous metabolomic studies have implicated mitochondrial energy metabolism, lipid remodeling, and carnitine-related pathways in sarcopenia, but broader metabolic pathways linking these abnormalities remain unclear. We aimed to identify sarcopenia-related metabolic pathways by integrating metabolome-wide Mendelian Randomization (MR) with patient-derived serum and skeletal muscle multi-omics analysis.

METHODS

Two-sample MR analyses were performed using genome-wide association study summary statistics for 1400 circulating metabolite-related traits and three sarcopenia-related traits, appendicular lean mass (ALM), handgrip strength, and walking speed. Candidate metabolites retained after MR sensitivity filtering were subjected to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)-based pathway enrichment. The MR-prioritized pathway was then examined in an independent cohort of 40 postmenopausal women with or without sarcopenia using untargeted serum and skeletal muscle metabolomics. Patient-derived and the external public skeletal muscle transcriptomic datasets were analyzed to evaluate pathway-related transcriptomic patterns.

RESULTS

Lysine degradation was the only pathway meeting the predefined pathway-level FDR criterion in the ALM-negative direction. Lysine, carnitine, and N6,N6,N6-trimethyllysine contributed nominal negative MR associations to this pathway. Colocalization identified strong evidence of a shared causal signal for one carnitine locus…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free