Evidence Hub

Serum Carboxymethyl-lysine, an Advanced Glycation End Product, and Age-Related Macular Degeneration: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study

R. Semba, M. Cotch, V. Gudnason, G. Eiriksdottir, T. Harris, K. Sun, R. Klein, F. Jónasson et al.

JAMA ophthalmology, 2014

4,907 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Importance Advanced glycation end products have been implicated in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Objective To investigate the relationship between serum carboxymethyl-lysine (CML), a major circulating advanced glycation end product, and AMD in older adults. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Population-based sample of older adults in the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Participants 4907 adults, aged ≥66 years Exposure Serum CML and risk factors for AMD. Main Outcome Measures Early or late AMD, assessed through fundus images taken through dilated pupils using a 45-degree digital camera and grading for drusen size, type, area, increased retinal pigment, retinal pigment epithelial depigmentation, neovascular lesions, and geographic atrophy using the modified Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System. Results Of the 4907 participants, 1025 (20.9%) had early AMD and 276 (5.6%) had late AMD. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) serum CML concentrations among adults with no AMD, early AMD, and late AMD (exudative AMD and pure geographic atrophy) were 3.0 (0.9), 3.1 (1.0), and 3.1 (0.9) μmol/L, respectively (P = 0.07). Log serum CML (per 1 log SD) was not associated with any AMD (early and late AMD) (Odds Ratio [O.R.] 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval [C.I.] 0.90, 1.04, P = 0.44) or with late AMD (O.R. = 0.94, 95% C.I. 0.82, 1.08, P = 0.36) in respective multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, body mass…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 4,907 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free