Evidence Hub

Alterations of the paired maternal fecal microbiota and neonatal meconium microbiota in newborns from pregnant women with hypertensive disorders

Heng Yang, Zhijiang He, Jianfen Lai, Jing Yang, Qianrong Huang, Ying Chang, Mingyuan Tian, Hongli Huang

Frontiers in Microbiology, 2025

67 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) pose significant risks to both maternal and fetal health and have been associated with alterations in the maternal gut microbiota. However, the impact of HDP on neonatal microbiota remains poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize the gut microbiota of pregnant women with HDP and evaluate its potential influence on the meconium microbiota of their newborns. Methods A cohort of 67 pregnant women, including 36 diagnosed with HDP (HDP group) and 31 healthy, age-matched controls (HC group), along with their offspring, were recruited. Fecal samples collected during the third trimester and meconium samples from the newborns were subjected to microbial community profiling via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distances revealed significant differences in microbial community composition between the HDP and HC groups in both maternal and neonatal samples. Subgroup analyses, stratified by HDP severity and medication use, further delineated distinct microbial profiles relative to controls. Notably, both maternal and neonatal microbiota in the HDP group exhibited increased abundances of Enterobacter, Klebsiella, and Sphingomonas, coupled with a reduction in Acidovorax, Azospirillum, Caulobacter, Flavobacterium, Magnetospirillum, and Rubrivivax compared to the HC group. Moreover, the P4-PWY pathway, which is involved in the biosynthesis of L-lysine, L-threonine, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free