Evidence Hub

Identification of pyruvic and maleic acid as potential markers for disease activity and prognosis in chronic urticaria

Xing-Xing Jian, Gui-Xue Hou, Li-Qiao Li, Zhuo Diao, Yingfang Wu, Jia-Yi Wang, Lu Xie, Cong Peng et al.

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2024

144 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Population-based studies have highlighted the link between chronic urticaria (CU) and metabolic syndrome, and metabolic alterations have been revealed in CU. However, to our knowledge, a comprehensive metabolomics study on a large cohort of CU patients has not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the underlying metabolic subtypes and novel metabolite biomarkers for CU diagnosis and therapy.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 80 CU patients and 82 healthy controls (HCs) were collected for metabolomics quantification and performed bioinformatics analysis. Another independent cohort consisting of 144 CU patients was studied to validate the findings. Bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) and IgE-induced passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) mice were utilized for in vitro and in vivo experiments, respectively.

RESULTS

We observed clear metabolomics difference between CU and HC. Meanwhile, differential metabolites N6-acetyl-l-lysine, L-aspartate, maleic acid and pyruvic acid were used to respectively construct random forest classifiers, and achieved AUCs greater than 0.85, suggesting their potential as diagnostic biomarkers of CU. More importantly, by exploring the underlying metabolic subtypes of CU, we found that the low abundance of pyruvic acid and maleic acid was significantly related to the activity of CU, poor efficacy of second-generation H1-antihistamines (sgAHs), and short relapse-free time. The results were validated in the independent cohort. Moreover,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 144 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free