Evidence Hub

Plasma Levels of Advanced Glycation Endproducts and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: Findings From 2 Prospective Cohorts

J. A. Lamprea-Montealegre, A. Arnold, R. McClelland, K. Mukamal, L. Djoussé, M. Biggs, D. Siscovick, R. Tracy et al.

Journal of the American Heart Association : Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2022

1,631 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Background Advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) have been linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in cohorts with and without diabetes. Data are lacking on prospective associations of various α‐dicarbonyl‐derived AGEs and incident CVD in the general population. We tested the hypothesis that major plasma AGEs are associated with new‐onset CVD in 2 population‐based cohorts of differing age and comorbidities. Methods and Results Analyses involved a random subcohort (n=466) from the Cardiovascular Health Study and a case‐cohort sample (n=1631) from the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Five AGEs and 2 oxidative products were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Associations with CVD (myocardial infarction and stroke) were evaluated with Cox regression. Participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study were older than the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and had more comorbidities, along with higher levels of all AGEs. During median follow‐up of 11 years, 439 participants in the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and 200 in the Cardiovascular Health Study developed CVD. After multivariable adjustment, carboxymethyl‐lysine, 3‐deoxyglucosone hydroimidazolones and a summary variable of all measured AGEs (principal component 1) were significantly associated with incident CVD in the Cardiovascular Health Study (HRs [95% CI]: 1.20 [1.01, 1.42], 1.45 [1.23, 1.72], and 1.29 [1.06, 1.56], respectively), but not the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,631 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free