Evidence Hub

A prospective study of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products and colorectal cancer risk in postmenopausal women

Liang Chen, Z. Duan, L. Tinker, H. Sangi-Haghpeykar, H. Strickler, G. Ho, M. Gunter, T. Rohan et al.

Cancer Epidemiology, 2016

18 citations

Abstract

Objectives Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) expressed on adipocytes and immune cells can bind to ligand Nε-(carboxymethyl)-lysine (CML) and trigger dysregulation of adipokines and chronic inflammation. Soluble RAGE (sRAGE) mitigates the detrimental effect of RAGE. We examined the associations between circulating levels of CML-AGE and sRAGE and colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods In a case-cohort study of the Women’s Health Initiative Study, blood levels of CML-AGE and sRAGE were measured using ELISA. We used multivariable Cox regression model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident CRC in relation to quartiles (Q) of biomarker levels. Results Average follow-up was 7.8 years for 444 cases and 805 subcohort members. In the subcohort, CML-AGE and sRAGE were inversely correlated with BMI (P values < 0.0001). Levels of CML-AGE and sRAGE were not associated with CRC. In BMI-specific analysis, the association between sRAGE and CRC was observed. Among women with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, those with highest levels of sRAGE had significantly lower risk for CRC as compared to women with lowest levels of sRAGE (HRQ4 versus Q1: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17–0.91). This inverse association was not observed among women with BMI <25 kg/m2 (P value for interaction = 0.01). Conclusions Among postmenopausal women, the RAGE pathway may be involved in obesity-related CRC.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free