Evidence Hub

Serum Carboxymethyl-lysine, a Dominant Advanced Glycation End Product, is Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

R. Semba, J. Fink, K. Sun, B. Windham, L. Ferrucci

Journal of renal nutrition, 2009

750 participants · 59 citations

Abstract

Objective: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are modifiable risk factors for renal disease that have been primarily studied in persons with diabetes or end-stage renal disease. The objective was to characterize the relationship between AGEs and renal function in community-dwelling adults. Design: Serum L-carboxymethyl-lysine (CML), a dominant AGE, was compared with renal function in a cross-sectional analysis. Setting: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) in Baltimore, Maryland. Patients or Other Participants: Community-dwelling men and women, aged 26-93 years, seen in a regular BLSA follow-up visit between 2002 and 2007. Main outcome measure: Chronic kidney disease (CKD), ≥stage 3 of National Kidney Foundation classification (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and eGFR. Results: Of 750 adults, 121 (16.1%) had CKD. Serum CML was associated with CKD (Odds Ratio [O.R.] expressed per 1 Standard Deviation [S.D.], 1.37, 95% Confidence Interval [C.I.] 1.11-1.67, P = 0.003) in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age, race, smoking, and chronic diseases. Serum CML was associated with eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) (beta = −2.21, standard error = 0.57, P = 0.0001) in multivariate linear regression model adjusting for age, race, smoking, and chronic diseases. After excluding patients with diabetes, serum CML was associated with CKD (O.R. per 1 S.D., 1.38, 95% C.I. 1.12-1.70, P = 0.003) and eGFR (beta = −2.09, standard error =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 750 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free