Evidence Hub

The relationships between plasma advanced glycation end products level and cognitive function in middle-aged and elderly Chinese subjects

Xiaohui Zhang, Qiuping Zhang, Zi-Yan Ren, Chunmin Wang, Liangkai Chen, Jingsi Chen, Jian Li, Yu Xia et al.

International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2023

1,834 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationships between circulating representative advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and cognitive performance in middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study with 1834 participants were included. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Plasma free AGEs including Nε-carboxymethyl-L-lysine (CML), Nε-(1-carboxyethyl) lysine (CEL), S-carboxymethyl-L-cysteine (CMC) and Nδ-(5-hydro-5-methyl-4-imidazolon-2-yl)-ornithine (MG-H1) were measured by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Multivariate adjusted linear and logistic regression analysis were used to explore the associations between plasma AGEs and cognitive function.

RESULTS

The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was 17.94%. Plasma CMC and MG-H1 level were negatively associated with MMSE score (β = -0.42, p < 0.001 for all) in the multivariate linear regression analysis. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, compared to the lowest tertile, participants within the highest tertile of CMC and MG-H1 had increased risk of MCI [ORs (95% CI): 1.62 (1.21-2.17), P trend <0.001, and ORs (95% CI): 1.30 (0.97-1.76), P trend = 0.069, respectively]. In addition, the weighted quantile sum (WQS) index was negatively associated with MMSE (β = -0.48, P < 0.001) and increased risk of MCI [ORs (95% CI): 1.35 (1.20-1.52), P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Combined exposure of plasma free…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,834 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free