Evidence Hub

Advanced Glycation End Products and Their Circulating Receptors and Level of Kidney Function in Older Community-Dwelling Women

R. Semba, L. Ferrucci, J. Fink, K. Sun, J. Beck, Mansi Dalal, J. Guralnik, L. Fried

American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2008

548 participants · 81 citations

Abstract

Background Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and the receptor for AGE (RAGE) are implicated in the pathogenesis of renal disease but their relation with level of kidney function has not been well characterized. Study Design Cross-sectional and prospective. Setting and Participants 548 moderately to severely disabled community-dwelling women in the Women's Health and Aging Study I in Baltimore, Maryland. Predictor Serum L-carboxymethyl-lysine (CML), a dominant AGE, total RAGE (sRAGE), and endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE). Outcomes & Measurements Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), prevalent and incident reduced GFR (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Serum CML, sRAGE, and esRAGE. Results Of 548 women, 283 (51.6%) had reduced GFR at baseline. Serum CML was associated with reduced GFR (Odds Ratios [O.R.; all expressed per 1 Standard Deviation], 1.98, 95% Confidence Interval [C.I.] 1.41-2.76, P <0.001) in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age, race, hemoglobin A1c, and chronic diseases. Serum sRAGE (ng/mL) and esRAGE (ng/mL), respectively, were associated with reduced GFR (O.R. 1.42, 95% C.I. 1.12-1.79, P = 0.003; O.R. 1.42, 95% C.I. 1.14-1.77, P = 0.001) in separate multivariate logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders. Of 230 women without reduced GFR at baseline, 32 (13.9%) developed reduced GFR by the follow-up visit 12 months later. Serum CML (μg/mL), sRAGE (ng/mL), and esRAGE (ng/mL), respectively, at baseline was associated with the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 548 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free