Evidence Hub

Beneficial outcome of early dietary lysine restriction as an adjunct to pyridoxine therapy in a child with pyridoxine dependant epilepsy due to Antiquitin deficiency

M. Kava, L. Bryant, P. Rowe, B. Lewis, L. Greed, S. Balasubramaniam

JIMD Reports, 2020

17 citations

Abstract

Pyridoxine‐dependent epilepsy (PDE) is a potentially treatable vitamin‐responsive epileptic encephalopathy. The most prevalent form of PDE is due to an underlying genetic defect in ALDH7A1 encoding Antiquitin (ATQ), an enzyme with α‐aminoadipic semialdehyde dehydrogenase (AASADH) activity which facilitates cerebral lysine degradation. Devastating outcomes including intellectual disability and significant developmental delays are still observed in 75% to 80% of pyridoxine responsive individuals with good seizure control, potentially attributable to the accumulation of toxic intermediates α‐aminoadipic semialdehyde (AASA) and its cyclic form Δ1‐piperideine‐6‐carboxylate (P6C) in plasma, urine and CSF. Thus, adjunct treatment strategies incorporating lysine restriction and arginine supplementation, separately or in combination with pyridoxine have been attempted to enhance seizure control and improve cognitive function. We describe a 4 year old girl with classical PDE who demonstrated significant improvements in clinical, neurological and developmental outcomes including absence of clinical seizures and cessation of antiepileptic medications since age 3 months, normalisation of EEG, significant improvement in the white matter signal throughout the cerebrum on neuroimaging and significant reduction in urine P6C and pipecolic acid levels post‐ combined therapy with lysine restricted diet in conjunction with pyridoxine and folinic acid. Lysine restriction was well tolerated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free