Evidence Hub

An acetylated Tau-174 CSF biomarker discriminates between TDP-43 and tau pathology in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration

M. Honey, Y. Hok-A-Hin, Elisabeth H. Thijssen, K. Cousins, Babette van der Weijden, Lisanne In 't Veld, E. Stoops, S. D. de Boer et al.

Nature Medicine, 2026

513 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Biomarkers to determine underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) tau or TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP) pathology during life are needed to advance clinical trials targeting specific FTD pathologies. For this purpose, we developed a new ultrasensitive immunoassay to quantify acetylated tau at lysine 174 (AcTau174) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In a sporadic cohort (n = 513), AcTau174 concentrations were higher in all dementia groups (FTLD-TDP, FTLD-Tau, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-AD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)) compared to controls. The largest increase was observed in the FTLD-TDP group, particularly patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) and GRN mutation carriers. Notably, AcTau174 discriminated FTLD-TDP from FTLD-Tau (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75–0.91) and FTLD-TDP from controls (AUC = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92–0.99) with high accuracy. This was replicated in independent, sporadic and genetic validation cohorts (164 patients and 24 controls), albeit with somewhat lower accuracy (FTLD-TDP versus FTLD-Tau; AUC range = 0.75–0.79) and wider CIs. Within the FTLD-TDP, AD and MCI-AD groups, higher AcTau174 concentrations were associated with a faster cognitive decline over time. In summary, CSF AcTau174 has great potential to discriminate FTLD-TDP from FTLD-Tau as a biomarker reflecting FTLD-TDP disease severity and progression. A new cerebrospinal fluid biomarker,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 513 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free