Evidence Hub

Shorespan-007: Phase 3 study of bomedemstat versus hydroxyurea in essential thrombocythemia naive to cytoreductive therapy

Kristen M. Pettit, Yuka Sugimoto, E. Zimran, Y. Shimomura, Hiroki Yamaguchi, H. Hasselbach, J. Kiladjian, Steffen Koschmieder et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

300 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

TPS6587

Background:

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an enzyme that regulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell proliferation and maturation. Bomedemstat (MK-3543) is an LSD1 inhibitor shown to have manageable safety and improve symptoms, durably reduce platelet and white blood cell (WBC) count, and reduce mutation burden in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) in a phase 2 study. Here, we describe the methodology of the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 Shorespan-007 study (NCT06456346), which has been designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bomedemstat compared with hydroxyurea in participants with ET naive to cytoreductive therapy.

Methods:

Key eligibility criteria include patients aged ≥18 years with an ET diagnosis per WHO diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms, an indication for cytoreductive therapy, no prior cytoreductive therapy, a bone marrow fibrosis score of 0 or 1, a platelet count of >450 × 10

9

/L, and an absolute neutrophil count of ≥0.75 × 10

9

/L. Key exclusion criteria include a documented increased risk of bleeding or an active infection necessitating systemic therapy. Approximately 300 participants will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to bomedemstat at a starting dose of 50 mg/day by mouth titrated to a target platelet count of ≥150× 10

9

/L to ≤350 × 10

9

/L or hydroxyurea at a starting dose of 500 mg/day by mouth titrated per the approved product labeling. The primary end point is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free