Evidence Hub

Tumor-Confirmed Follicular Lymphoma Mutations Are Detectable in Peripheral Blood Years Prior to Clinical Diagnosis

J. Schroers-Martin, Joanne Soo, G. Brisou, F. Scherer, D. Kurtz, B. Sworder, M. Khodadoust, Michael C. Jin et al.

Blood, 2021

29 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background:

Mutations in chromatin modifying genes (CMGs) including KMT2D, CREBBP, EZH2, and EP300 have been inferred as early events in follicular lymphoma (FL) by truncal status in mature tumors and persistence between diagnosis and relapse. We previously reported frequent detection of CREBBP lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) domain mutations in pre-diagnostic blood and tissue specimens from individuals later developing FL (Schroers-Martin et al, ASH Annual Meeting 2017). However, the limited availability of paired tumor biopsies has precluded confirmation of concordance between precursor lesions and subsequent clinical malignancy.

Methods:

The American Cancer Society (ACS) Cancer Prevention Study-II (CPS-II) LifeLink cohort collected screening blood or saliva samples from over 100,000 cancer-free American participants between 1998 and 2002. To evaluate detection of tumor-confirmed variants in pre-diagnostic specimens, we identified 29 FL patients with available FFPE tumor biopsy and screening sample (Fig A). The median age at screening was 71 years (range 56-83) with a median time to FL diagnosis of 56 months (TTD, range 6-139).

Tumor biopsies were sequenced utilizing hybrid capture sequencing for commonly mutated lymphoma genes. DNA extracted from pre-diagnostic blood or saliva cell pellet specimens was sequenced utilizing error-corrected CAPP-Seq (Newman et al Nat Biotech 2016) to a median depth of 5204x. We sequenced to similar depths peripheral blood DNA from control…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free