Evidence Hub

Genomic analysis of oesophageal carcinoma (EC) to identify recurrent mutations in histone methyltransferases as a distinctive subset

Jing-Yuan Wang, J. Xiu, M. Oberley, F. Battaglin, H. Arai, S. Soni, Wu Zhang, R. Goldberg et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024

604 participants

Abstract

379 Background: Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2 (KMT2) family proteins methylate lysine 4 on the histone H3 tail at important regulatory regions in the genome and thereby impart crucial functions through modulating chromatin structures and DNA accessibility, which is associated with tumorigenesis and immune tolerance, indicating its possible correlation with the efficacy of immunotherapy. Recurrent mutations of KMT2 have been identified in EC, but data addressing the molecular features of KMT2 mutated (MT) EC are lacking. We aimed to understand the molecular profile of KMT2 -MT EC. Methods: A total of 787 oesophageal carcinoma [adenocarcinoma (EAC), N=604; squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), N=183] were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated based on somatic nonsynonymous mutations, and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status was evaluated by a combination of IHC, Fragment analysis and NGS. Results: The mutation spectrum of KMT2A/C/D was significantly different between ESCC and EAC ( KMT2A, 2.7% vs. 1.2%; KMT2C, 3.8% vs. 1.2%; KMT2D, 14.2% vs. 2.0%, P <0.05). KMT2-MT EAC tumors showed significantly higher mutation rates in CIC (13% vs 1.1%), NF1 (12.5% vs 2.2%), FBXW7 (12% vs 3.4%), ATM (11.5% vs 2.6%) and BRCA1 (11.5% vs 1%, all q<0.05), compared to KMT2-WT tumors. However, in ESCC there were no significant differences…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free