Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin injection in Japan

Matsuura K, Miyoshi T, Suto C, Akura J, Inoue Y

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2013

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report endophthalmitis rates after cataract surgery and the incidence of complications after intracameral moxifloxacin injection.

SETTING: Nineteen clinics in Japanese institutions.

DESIGN: Retrospective survey cohort study.

METHODS: The number of surgeries and endophthalmitis cases in the past 4 years before and after the introduction of intracameral moxifloxacin was evaluated. The survey was performed by mail or interview in February 2013.

RESULTS: All institutions used total-replacement administration rather than small-volume injection. At 3 institutions, 50 to 100 μg/mL moxifloxacin; at 9 institutions, 100 to 300 μg/mL moxifloxacin; and at 7 institutions, 500 μg/mL moxifloxacin was administered. The highest concentration (500 μg/mL) was administered in 14,124 cases. Endophthalmitis cases occurred 1 month or sooner postoperatively in 8 of 15,958 cases (ie, 1 in 1955) without intracameral moxifloxacin administration and in 3 of 18,794 cases (ie, 1 in 6265) with intracameral moxifloxacin administration.

CONCLUSIONS: Intracameral moxifloxacin (50 to 500 μg/mL) administration decreased the risk for endophthalmitis by 3-fold. In more than 18,000 cases, moxifloxacin administration of 500 μg/mL or less did not result in severe complications, such as toxic anterior segment syndrome or corneal endothelial cell loss.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free