Evidence Hub

Next Generation TB Drug Combinations from the Pan-TB Consortium: Combination Efficacy and Contributions of Individual Agents, Evaluated in a BALB/c Mouse TB Model

Sordello S, Le Coupanec A, Vahlas Z, Roversi C, Visentin R, Boulenc X, Federico D, Zannoni S et al.

2026

1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Project to Accelerate New Treatments for Tuberculosis (PAN-TB) aims to accelerate development of shorter, simpler and safer pan-TB combinations. We previously identified 3 out of 25 first-generation novel PAN-TB 4-drug combinations, that cured 90% of mice in less than 3 months, at clinically relevant doses in the relapsing mouse model of TB. These regimens include BPa830Sut, BPa286Sut and BQSut286 (B: bedaquiline; Pa: pretomanid; 830: GSK3211830; 286: GSK2556286; Sut: sutezolid; Q: quabodepistat). Here, we assess the efficacy of these combinations where the original candidates are substituted next-generation or more advanced compounds (ganfeborole (656) for 830, sorfequiline, S for B, TBD09 for Sut and TBD11 for 286) and the individual contributions of specific agents. Six novel regimens demonstrated bactericidal activity more rapid than comparators PHMZ (Rifapentine P, Isoniazid H, Moxifloxacin M, Pyrazinamide Z) and BPaMZ. Modelled cure/relapse data showed that SPa286Sut, SPaSut and SPa656Sut cured 90% of mice in about 1 month, while SPa286, SPaQTBD11 and SPaTBD09 in less than 2 months, faster than PHMZ. Consistent with our previous findings, the fastest-curing regimens centered on a diarylquinoline (S), a nitroimidazole (Pa) and an oxazolidinone (TBD09 or Sut) together with an Rv1625c agonist (TBD11 or 286), DprE1 inhibitor (Q) or a LeuRS inhibitor (656). Notably, significant contributions to sterilizing efficacy were demonstrated for S in all combinations…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free