Evidence Hub

Nonclinical pharmacokinetics and relative efficacy of the first 25 novel tuberculosis drug combinations from the PAN-TB consortium: Use of the BALB/c relapsing mouse model and combination pharmacokinetics within a modeling-based framework

Sordello S, Tagliavini A, Boulenc X, Brock L, Zannoni S, Roversi C, Visentin R, Metcalf D et al.

2026

2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Project to Accelerate New Treatments for Tuberculosis (PAN-TB) aims to accelerate development of shorter, simpler and safer pan-TB combinations, effective for use in both Drug Susceptible (DS)- and Drug Resistant (DR)- TB patients. Towards this aim, bactericidal and sterilizing activity of 25 priority 4-drug combinations was evaluated at doses targeting clinically relevant exposures, in the BALB/c relapsing mouse model of TB. The combinations comprised 8 PAN-TB drugs and candidates: bedaquiline (B), pretomanid (Pa), delamanid (Del), quabodepistat (Q), sutezolid (Sut), GSK2556286 (286), GSK3211830 (830) and ganfeborole (GSK3036656, (656)). Combination PK studies in infected mice enabled dose selection and a population-PK approach guided dosing so that compounds should achieve mean AUC 0-24 within 2-fold of their clinical target exposures during the efficacy studies. All test combinations showed time-dependent bactericidal activity, with six regimens reducing lung bacterial burdens below the limit of detection with 8 weeks’ treatment, similar to the comparator BPaMZ (M is moxifloxacin and Z as pyrazinamide). Cure/Relapse data were modelled to derive population time to cure 90% mice (T90) values. Fifteen PAN-TB combinations had T90s of less than 5 months, sterilizing mice faster than the standard of care for drug susceptible TB, RHZE/RH. The best-performing PAN-TB combinations, BPa830Sut, BPa286Sut and BQSut286, cured 90% of mice in less than 3 months. These 3…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free