Evidence Hub

A Randomized Double-Blinded Crossover Trial to Define the ECG Effects of Mipomersen (ISIS 301012) Using a Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Dose Compared to Placebo and Moxifloxacin (a Positive Control) in Healthy Men and Women: A Thorough ECG Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2010

60 participants

Abstract

To assess the electrocardiogram (ECG) effects of mipomersen administered as a 200-mg subcutaneous (SC) therapeutic and a 200-mg intravenous (IV; \[2-hour infusion\]) supra-therapeutic dose relative to placebo in healthy adult male and female subjects; and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of mipomersen when administered as a single therapeutic (200 mg) SC and a single, supra-therapeutic (200 mg) IV dose.

Conditions: Healthy.

Primary outcome: change from baseline in QTcF (corrected Frederica's CT interval).

Enrollment: 60 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free