Evidence Hub

A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Positive-controlled, 4-Period Crossover Trial to Assess the Effect of Anagrelide Hydrochloride on QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Men and Women

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2012

60 participants

Abstract

According to the ICH Guidance Document E14, all non-antiarrhythmic drugs should be evaluated for their ability to prolong the QT interval which represents the duration of ventricular depolarization and subsequent repolarization. The primary objective of the study is to assess the effect of anagrelide on QT/QTc interval following a therapeutic and supratherapeutic dose of anagrelide when compared to placebo and a positive control.

Conditions: Healthy.

Primary outcome: Mean Difference Changes From Baseline Versus Placebo in QTcNi Intervals From Time-Matched Analysis by Largest Time Point; Mean Difference Changes From Baseline Versus Placebo in Heart Rate From Time-Matched Analysis by Largest Time Point; Mean Difference Changes From Baseline Versus Placebo in QTcF Intervals From Time-Matched Analysis by Largest Time Point; Mean Difference Changes From Baseline Versus Placebo in QTcB Intervals From Time-Matched Analysis by Largest Time Point; Mean Difference Changes From Baseline Versus Placebo in QT Intervals From Time-Matched Analysis by Largest Time Point.

Enrollment: 60 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free