Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Tricilest (Norgestimate-ethinyl Estradiol) and Diane-35 (Cyproterone Acetate-ethinyl Estradiol) in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol as comparted with cyproterone acetate-ethinyl estradiol among female patients with moderate acne vulgaris.
Conditions: Acne Vulgaris.
Primary outcome: The primary efficacy variable was the change form baseline to the latest available evaluation in total lesion count. The primary efficacy result of this study clearly manifested the potency of TriCilest..
Enrollment: 48 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 48 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Synthesis, In Vitro and In Silico Molecular Docking Studies of Novel Phthalimide–Pyrimidine Hybrid Analogues to Thalidomide as Potent Antitubercular Agents
- Exploring the inhibitory performance of expired moxifloxacin and norfloxacin on copper corrosion in saline environment
- Molecular investigation of antimicrobial peptides against Helicobacter pylori proteins using a peptide-protein docking approach
- Screening of novel narrow-spectrum benzofuroxan derivatives for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis through in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches
- Synthesis, Characterization, Anticancer, Antioxidant, and In Silico Evaluation of Semicarbazides and Thiosemicarbazides
- Fast and accurate prediction of drug induced proarrhythmic risk with sex specific cardiac emulators
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.