Evidence Hub

Moxifloxacin plus standard first-line therapy in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: A meta-analysis

Chen Z, Liang JQ, Wang JH, Feng SS, Zhang GY

Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2015

2,056 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

The fluoroquinolone moxifloxacin has potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and has been recommended by the guidelines for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Monotherapy is not recommended by the guidelines and only a few studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin plus standard first-line therapy in treating TB. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to further investigate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin plus standard therapy compared with standard therapy alone in treating patients with pulmonary TB. Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar (until February 12, 2015) were searched for studies that evaluated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin in the treatment of pulmonary TB. Rate of culture conversion and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed. Risk of bias and sensitivity analysis, using the leave-one-out approach, was used to assess the robustness of the findings. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis which covered 2056 patients with pulmonary TB. For all included studies, the drug regimens at least contained rifampicin and pyrazinamide and the length of treatment was at least eight weeks. The odds ratio (OR) for the negative culture rate for moxifloxacin plus first-line medications compared first-line medications alone (the control group) was 1.60 with 95% CI in 0.93-2.74 (P = 0.089), indicating the moxifloxacin plus first-line medications had no significantly greater rate of culture…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,056 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free