Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation in treating pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fan C, Ye X, Wang C, Wu Y, Tong B, Han L

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study endeavors to assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin D (VD) supplementation among pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) adults receiving standard anti-tuberculosis (TB) therapy. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies evaluating VD supplementation as an adjunct to standard therapy in patients with drug-susceptible TB were included. Eligible studies compared clinical outcomes between patients receiving VD supplementation regardless of formulation or route of administration (RoA) and those receiving standard therapy alone. The number of included studies and participants varied across outcomes. Data on study design, participant characteristics, VD regimens, and outcome measures were systematically extracted. Risk ratio (RR) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes, and standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous outcomes. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Sensitivity analyses and predefined subgroup analyses (e.g., by treatment duration and RoA) were performed. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Adjunctive VD supplementation significantly increased the sputum smear conversion (SSC) rate (RR: 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.19; P = 0.0001; high GRADE certainty;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free