Evidence Hub

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of rhinosinusitis

Huang Z, Xuan X, Liu S, Lin J, Qian Z, Chen L, Qiu R, Cai Y

Medicine, 2024

4,490 participants

Abstract

Background: Rhinosinusitis (RS), a common inflammatory disorder, adversely affects quality of life and can progress to serious complications without intervention. Conventional therapies, including antibiotics and corticosteroids, exhibit inherent limitations and risks. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), with its extensive historical use in RS management, remains understudied in contemporary evaluations. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of TCM in RS treatment, aiming to guide clinical decision-making.

Methods: A systematic search was undertaken in Chinese and English databases, such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other relevant databases, to gather randomized controlled trials of TCM for patients with RS from January 2014 to February 2024. Two researchers independently curated and synthesized data from eligible literature, conducted meta-analyses with ReviewManager 5.4.1, and assessed evidence quality via GRADEPro GDT.

Results: A total of 48 articles included 4490 patients, of which 2249 were control group and 2241 were in the experimental group. Meta-analytic outcomes revealed that the integration of TCM with western medicine conventional treatment significantly enhanced the total effective rate [risk ratio=1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.17, 1.23), P 0.05).

Conclusion: Combining TCM with western medicine in RS treatment yields superior outcomes over western medicine alone, with enhanced efficacy,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,490 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free