Evidence Hub

Pretomanid for tuberculosis: a systematic review

Gils T, Lynen L, de Jong BC, Van Deun A, Decroo T

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of treatment of tuberculosis patients with regimens including pretomanid have not yet been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES: To appraise existing evidence on efficacy and safety of pretomanid in tuberculosis.

DATA SOURCES: Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov. and Cochrane library.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Quantitative studies presenting original data on clinical efficacy or safety of pretomanid.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients with tuberculosis.

INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with pretomanid or pretomanid-containing regimens in minimum one study group.

METHODS: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data on efficacy (early bactericidal activity, bactericidal activity, end-of-treatment outcomes and acquired resistance) and safety were summarized in tables. Mean differences in efficacy outcomes between regimens across studies were calculated.

RESULTS: Eight studies were included; four randomized controlled trials on 2-week early bactericidal activity in rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis, three trials with randomized rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis arms and a single rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis arm (two on 8-week bactericidal activity, one on end-of-treatment outcomes), one single-arm trial with end-of-treatment outcomes in highly resistant tuberculosis. Activity of pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide was superior to standard treatment on daily change in colony-forming units at days 0-2, 0-56 and 7-56 and time to culture conversion in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free