Evidence Hub

Current Knowledge on the Impact of Extracorporeal Blood Purification Devices on Drug Clearance: Systematic Search and Narrative Review

Paul R, Ansari AS, Ballesteros D, Klaus T, Honoré PM

Blood purification, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) devices are increasingly used in critically ill patients to manage sepsis, hyperinflammatory states, and other life-threatening conditions. However, these devices may unintentionally remove therapeutic medications, potentially compromising efficacy. Understanding these interactions is essential to optimize therapy and ensure patient safety.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and manufacturer-specific databases was performed to identify literature on drug removal by current adsorptive EBP devices. Studies were screened for evidence of drug clearance, including both preclinical and clinical (in vivo) data, using specific keywords related to drug removal and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

Results: Out of 659 identified articles, 61 met the inclusion criteria. CytoSorb was the most extensively studied device, with 25 relevant publications - 19 of which included in vivo data. Data on drug removal were found for 43 substances with CytoSorb, 8 with Jafron, 12 with oXiris, 25 with Seraph, and 13 with PMX-HP. Antibiotics were the most commonly studied drug class, with vancomycin and meropenem being the most frequently investigated agents. While CytoSorb had the most comprehensive data, evidence for other devices was limited, especially regarding clinical studies.

Conclusions: Adsorptive EBP devices have the potential to unintentionally remove medications, which may compromise therapeutic effectiveness in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free