Evidence Hub

Systematic review of pharmacotherapy strategies in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa

Natalia Nafalska, Małgorzata Stopyra, Krzysztof Feret, Aleksandra Ćwirko-Godycka, Kamil Kerknawi, Paulina Mikulec, Angelika Kędzierska, M. Bar et al.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS, acne inversa) is a chronic, recurrent inflammatory dermatosis with an etiopathogenesis that remains not fully understood. Characteristic skin lesions—nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and scars—are most commonly located in skin fold areas, leading to a significant deterioration in patients’ quality of life, both physically and psychosocially. Despite advances in medical knowledge, the diagnosis of HS is often delayed, and treatment represents a major clinical challenge requiring individualized therapeutic approaches. This article provides a review of current literature on pharmacological treatment strategies for HS, including both topical and systemic therapies. Particular emphasis is placed on antibiotic therapy (e.g., tetracyclines, combination therapy with clindamycin and rifampicin, triple-drug regimens, ertapenem), as well as hormonal and immunomodulatory treatments. Furthermore, the growing role of biologic therapies, including TNF-α and interleukin inhibitors, and the use of emerging targeted agents under investigation are discussed. Attention is also drawn to the importance of androgen receptors and their potential role in the pathogenesis of HS, as reflected in the effectiveness of antiandrogen therapies (e.g., spironolactone or oral contraceptives containing a progestogenic component). The review includes data on the efficacy, safety, and limitations of various therapeutic methods based on clinical trials and systematic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free