Evidence Hub

Steroids and Cross-Linking for Ulcer Treatment: The SCUT II Randomized Clinical Trial

Prajna NV, Lalitha P, Chandru S, Radhakrishnan N, Christy J, Karthikeyan A, Rajaraman R, Ramesh R et al.

JAMA ophthalmology, 2025

280 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Importance

Adjunctive topical corticosteroids and/or corneal cross-linking (CXL) have the potential to improve outcomes in bacterial keratitis.

Objective

To determine the benefit of adjunctive topical difluprednate and CXL with riboflavin in addition to topical antibiotics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded, sham, placebo-controlled trial randomizing participants to topical moxifloxacin, 0.5%, plus topical placebo plus sham CXL, vs topical moxifloxacin, 0.5%, plus difluprednate, 0.05%, plus sham CXL, vs topical moxifloxacin, 0.5%, plus difluprednate, 0.05%, plus CXL. Between September 2020 and October 2023, participants in clinics at the Aravind Eye Hospitals in India and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, in Miami, Florida, were screened for inclusion. Included participants had smear- and/or culture-positive bacterial corneal ulcers with Snellen visual acuity of 20/40 or worse.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was logMAR best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 6 months.

Results

Of the 1992 participants with smear-positive bacterial corneal ulcers screened, 280 participants (14%; mean [SD] age, 51 [16] years; 182 male [65%]) were enrolled. After controlling for baseline, there was no difference in 6-month VA with adjunctive topical steroids vs placebo (-0.04; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.09; P = .58) or with adjunctive CXL and topical steroids vs topical steroids alone (0.04; 95% CI, -0.09 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 280 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free