Evidence Hub

Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Aficamten on QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Participants

Maharao N, Xu D, Simkins TJ, Bowles O, Liu G, Benattia Y, Griffith A, Heitner SB et al.

Clinical and translational science, 2025

34 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Aficamten is a next-in-class, small-molecule, cardiac myosin inhibitor in development for treating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This 2-part study evaluated aficamten's impact on QTc interval in healthy participants. Part A (n = 10) was an open-label study to find the appropriate dose for thorough QT (TQT) evaluation in Part B. Part B (n = 34) was a double-blind, 3-way crossover TQT study conducted as per ICH E14 guidance using negative (placebo) and positive (moxifloxacin) controls. A single 50 mg aficamten dose achieved exposures (Cmax range: 124-1660 ng/mL) comparable to the highest clinical dose (20 mg QD) in obstructive HCM patients (NCT05186818; [Cmax range: 131-1230 ng/mL]) and was chosen for TQT evaluation. Using concentration-QT (C-QT) modeling, the placebo- and baseline-corrected QT interval using Fridericia's correction (ΔΔQTcF) was -1.82 msec (90% CI: -3.43, -0.214) at peak aficamten concentrations (298.3 ng/mL) following the 50 mg dose. The 90% CI upper bound of ΔΔQTcF for aficamten was < 10 msec at all post-dose time points. Assay sensitivity was established by the 90% CI lower bound for moxifloxacin (ΔΔQTcF) exceeding 5 msec. Aficamten did not cause QTc prolongation (using C-QT and by time point analyses) within observed plasma concentrations up to 1660 ng/mL (aficamten), 213 ng/mL (metabolite CK-3834282), and 343 ng/mL (metabolite CK-3834283). No clinically meaningful effect on electrocardiogram parameters, including absolute QTcF (≤ 450 msec) and change…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 34 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free