Evidence Hub

Effect of a Supratherapeutic Dose of Omaveloxolone on the Corrected QT Interval in Healthy Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Three-Way Crossover Study

Zahir H, Murai M, Wu L, Valentine M, Hynes SM

Clinical and translational science, 2025

30 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Omaveloxolone is approved for the treatment of Friedreich ataxia (FA) in patients aged ≥ 16 years at a dose of 150 mg once daily. This double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, three-way crossover, thorough corrected QT interval (QTc) study (NCT05927649) evaluated the effect of supratherapeutic omaveloxolone exposure on QTc to exclude a clinically significant prolongation (defined as > 10 ms). Healthy adults were randomized to one of six sequences of three single oral doses (omaveloxolone 450 mg, placebo, or moxifloxacin 400 mg [open-label positive control]) administered with an FDA high-fat meal. Serial pharmacokinetic blood sampling and time-matched electrocardiogram assessments were performed. The primary endpoint was placebo-corrected change from baseline in QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) following omaveloxolone administration. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic parameters of omaveloxolone and its major plasma metabolites (M17 and M22) and safety. All 30 enrolled participants completed the study. The mean omaveloxolone Cmax was 319 ng/mL in this study (4.5-fold the mean steady-state Cmax [71.5 ng/mL] with the approved dose). The mean QTcF intervals were < 450 ms, and mean changes from baseline were < 10 ms at all timepoints following all doses. The upper limit of the 90% CIs of ΔΔQTcF following omaveloxolone administration was < 10 ms at all timepoints. At the Cmax of omaveloxolone, M17, and M22, alone or combined, the upper limits of the 90% CIs of the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free