Evidence Hub

Microbiological Profile of Post-cataract Surgery Endophthalmitis with Usage of Prophylactic Intracameral Moxifloxacin

Sen S, Mishra C, Rameshkumar G, Babu Kannan N, Shekhar M, Lalitha P

Ocular immunology and inflammation, 2024

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effect of prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin (ICM) on microbiological profile and antimicrobial sensitivity of culture-proven postoperative endophthalmitis (POE).

METHODS: This study evaluated culture-proven POE diagnosed within 6 weeks of cataract surgery over two periods, period-1 (January 2010-March 2015) and period-2 (April 2015-December 2019), before and after introduction of prophylactic ICM, respectively.

RESULTS: In period-1, 100 cases of culture-positive POE were reported (1 in 4879, 0.02%), while 20 cases (1 in 24635, 0.004%) were reported in period-2 (5-fold reduction, p < .001). The cumulative culture positivity rate decreased from 27.6% to 17.1% (1.6-fold) . Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) were significantly reduced (p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS: ICM reduced the incidence of culture-proven POE, CoNS in particular. In future, POE caused by rarer pathogens may become more prevalent due to reduction in the rate of commoner and more virulent pathogens with use of intracameral antibiotics. The moxifloxacin sensitivity of CONS did not show change with the use of ICM. Studies with larger population of POE will be more helpful to understand the trend better.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free