Evidence Hub

Efficacy of intracameral moxifloxacin in prevention of postcataract surgery endophthalmitis: randomized control trial

Sharma N, Sen A, Sharma M, Bari A, Bari A, Shakkarwal C, Maharana PK, Agarwal T et al.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2026

7 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of intracameral moxifloxacin 0.5% in prevention of postcataract surgery endophthalmitis.

SETTINGS: 3 tertiary eye centers of northern India.

DESIGN: Multicentric randomized clinical study.

METHODS: 60 000 eyes undergoing phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were randomized in 2 groups in 1:1 format from January 2018 to June 2024. Group 1 received intracameral moxifloxacin (cases), whereas group 2 did not receive intracameral antibiotics (control). Any case of endophthalmitis in the postoperative period up to 6 weeks in both groups was documented and managed according to routine protocols.

RESULTS: The endothelial cell counts were comparable preoperatively ( P = .18) and postoperatively ( P = .54). 6 eyes (0.02%) in the intracameral moxifloxacin group developed endophthalmitis as compared with 16 eyes in the control group (0.05%) ( P = .04). The odds of developing endophthalmitis were 2.5 times lower with the usage of intracameral moxifloxacin. The mean time of presentation of endophthalmitis in groups 1 and 2 was 32.26 ± 23.42 days and 23.52 ± 13.91 days, respectively. 8 cases (8/22; 36.36%) were culture-positive of which one was fungus (n = 1/8; 12.5%), while rest were bacteria (n = 7/8; 87.5%). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly isolated microorganism (n = 4; 50%). Resistance to fluoroquinolones was higher for ciprofloxacin (5/7) and gatifloxacin (3/7) than moxifloxacin (2/7). At 3 months, 17 of 22…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 7 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free