Evidence Hub

Cardiac safety of bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin co-administered with or without varying doses of sutezolid or delpazolid for the treatment of drug-susceptible TB.

Koele SE, Stoycheva K, Mtweve C, Manyama C, Mpagama S, Mhimbira F, Wallis R, Ntinginya NE et al.

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2025

149 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Many drugs for the treatment of TB prolong the QTc interval, which is associated with an increased risk of developing a life-threatening arrhythmia known as torsades de pointes. Sutezolid and delpazolid are novel oxazolidinones with demonstrated bactericidal activity. We aimed to assess the effects of sutezolid or delpazolid co-administered with bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin on the QTcF interval (Fridericia’s correction). Furthermore, we developed a population pharmacodynamic model to assess the effects of drug exposure on the QTcTBT interval (TB-specific correction). Methods Participants were randomized to receive standard-dose bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin with varying doses of either sutezolid (no sutezolid, 600 mg daily, 1200 mg daily, 600 mg twice daily, 800 mg twice daily) or delpazolid (no delpazolid, 400 mg daily, 800 mg daily, 1200 mg daily, 800 mg twice daily). The QTc interval was determined using weekly ECG assessments. Results Data from 149 participants, yielding 2373 ECG observations were available for analysis. Nine participants (6.0%) experienced a Grade 3 QTcF prolongation as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The population pharmacodynamic model predicted a 13.2 ms (95% CI: 10.9–15.3) increase of the QTcTBT in the first week of treatment, but no further increase after that. The exposure of bedaquiline’s M2 metabolite was found to drive part of the QTcTBT. No exposure–response…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 149 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free