Evidence Hub

Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, Linezolid, and Moxifloxacin Treatment for Multi-Drug Resistant Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in Canada: A Report

Jollee S. T. Fung, Victoria J Cook, James Johnston, W. J. Connors

Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background

Updated global tuberculosis (TB) guidelines recommend the novel oral 6-month bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) regimen for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) based on superior efficacy and reduced toxicity demonstrated in clinical trials. These trials were dominated by isolated pulmonary TB; thus, data for BPaLM effectiveness for extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains limited.

Methods

We describe the safe and effective use of BPaLM in a patient for the treatment of MDR-TB involving an extrapulmonary site.

Results

Bedaquiline and pretomanid were obtained through the Health Canada Special Access Program and from the manufacturers 3 weeks later. The patient with gastrointestinal and subclinical pulmonary TB tolerated the 6 months of BPaLM well with no treatment interruptions. There was sustained microbiological and clinical response at 6 months after treatment completion.

Conclusion

Shorter duration, improved effectiveness, and reduced toxicity suggests that BPaLM should be considered when determining the ideal treatment regimen for MDR-TB. A more streamlined process for the procurement of bedaquiline and pretomanid will help minimize treatment initiation delay and overall isolation period. Further research is also needed to clarify longer-term outcomes and optimal dosing of BPaLM for EPTB, especially in more severe forms of disease or with malabsorption concerns.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free