Evidence Hub

Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis with Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, Linezolid with or Without Moxifloxacin (BPaL/M): Feasibility and Implementation Challenges in Western Canada

Paige Muir, Victoria J Cook, I. Sekirov, James Johnston, W. J. Connors

Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background

Rifampin-resistant (RR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) previously required treatment with a protracted course of toxic second-line TB drugs with suboptimal efficacy. Novel 6-month regimens of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid with or without moxifloxacin (BPaL/M) are now recommended, but implementation in Canada is not well described.

Methods

We analyzed eight people with MDR or pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR) TB or rifamycin intolerance treated with BPaL/M in western Canada to inform expanded use.

Results

The mean times to confirm first- and second-line phenotypic TB susceptibility profiles were 5 and 11 weeks, respectively. Time to start an effective treatment regimen took on average 5 weeks from date of diagnosis, and time to start BPaL/M took 11 weeks due to medication approval, access, and delivery delays. The mean time to culture and smear conversion was 3 and 5 weeks, respectively, from the start of effective therapy. Individuals were isolated for a mean of 15 weeks with an average duration of hospitalization of 13 weeks. BPaL/M medications were associated with minor toxicity, including mild non-progressive peripheral neuropathy (3 cases, CTCAE grade 2) and blood transfusion for anemia (3 cases, CTCAE grade 3), all managed by linezolid dose adjustments. The mean total treatment duration was 8 months, and all individuals completed 6-month BPaL/M treatment with microbiological and clinical cure as of last follow-up (mean 8 months).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free