Evidence Hub

A Phase 1, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of BMS-986419 (Part 1) and a Phase 1 Randomized, Double-blind, Positive-controlled, Placebo-controlled, Parallel, Nested-crossover (Moxifloxacin-placebo) Thorough QT/QTc Study to Evaluate the Effect of Multiple Doses of BMS-986419 on Cardiac Repolarization (Part 2) in Healthy Participants

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2025

74 participants

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-986419 (Part 1) and the effects of multiple doses of BMS-986419 on cardiac repolarization (Part 2) in healthy participants.

Conditions: Healthy Volunteers.

Primary outcome: Part 1: Number of Participants with Non-serious Adverse Events (NSAEs); Part 1: Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events (SAEs); Part 1: Number of Participants with AEs Leading to Discontinuation; Part 1: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest (AESI); Part 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities; Part 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Assessment Abnormalities; Part 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities; Part 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Abnormalities; Part 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination Abnormalities; Part 1: Number of Participants With Physical Examination Abnormalities; Part 2: ΔQTc: Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of BMS-986419 on Cardiac Repolarization Expressed by QT interval (QTc); Part 2: ΔΔQTc: Placebo-corrected Change From Baseline QTc Plasma Concentration of BMS-986419 on Cardiac Repolarization Expressed by QTc.

Enrollment: 74 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 74 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free